The proposed spending increase, which would take the Energy Department’s renewable spending up to $2.3 billion, compared to $1.8 billion in 2012, is a clear signal that Obama plans to push ahead with full-throated support of clean energy on the campaign trail, despite the Solyndra controversy.
The bump up is part of an overall increase in the Energy Department’s top-line request of $27.2 billion, up 3.2 percent from fiscal 2012 levels.
“In light of the tight discretionary spending caps, this increase in funding is significant and a testament to the importance of innovation and clean energy in the country’s economic future,” the agency wrote in its request.
Practically, though, the new clean energy spending is dead on arrival on Capitol Hill, where election-year partisan deadlock has all but assured that Congress won’t even pass a budget this year. And even if it did, the Republican-controlled House would be sure to attack any fresh Energy Department spending on renewable programs.
And while the boost in proposed clean energy spending seems bold by Obama in the face of the rain of criticism he knows will come from House Republicans, it represent a deeply scaled-down vision of his once-ambitious clean energy agenda. Campaigning for the White House in 2008, Obama proposed a sweeping energy plan that would have budgeted $150 billion over a decade in federal clean energy spending. By comparison, clean energy advocates say that this year’s relatively paltry proposal of $2.3 billion won’t come close to scaling up the nation’s clean energy economy to the size once envisioned by the Obama White House.
President Obama also proposes once again to slash long-standing tax breaks to coal, oil and gas companies, a move that would raise $46 billion over 10 years to help pay for the clean energy vision. Democrats have tried and failed for years to end these tax breaks, and they’ll likely have just as much success this year as in years past. The White House knows this, of course, but proposing to slash the tax breaks to oil companies gives Democrats and important talking point in an election year likely to see voter ire at high gasoline prices. It also helps set the stage for a debate on broad corporate tax reform in 2013. Although oil companies have fought the rollback of their tax breaks tooth and nail, they’ve said they would be willing to come to the table in 2013.
Most of the rest of the increase in the Energy Department’s funding request comes in boosts to its chief portfolio, managing the nation’s nuclear weapons arsenal. The agency requests $7.6 billion for weapons activities, a 5 percent increase above the 2012 enacted level, for such programs as continuing nuclear eweapon life extension program and sustaining the existing stockpile.
